What we don't do
LVA does not diagnose your condition, judge individual suitability, design combinations of use, recommend or reject any product, or endorse any brand.
LVA compares observable label information, public sources, price structures and the differences that cannot currently be verified. The final choice is yours.
- NO DIAGNOSIS
- Any judgment about your body, symptoms or health needs a qualified professional. This site does not provide it, not even indirectly through its content.
- NO JUDGMENT OF INDIVIDUAL SUITABILITY
- “Is this product right for me?” is an individual medical or nutritional question, not a question of product information.
- NO COMBINATIONS OF USE
- When to take something, how to schedule doses and in what order to combine products are all advice that requires professional qualifications.
- NO RECOMMENDATIONS, RANKINGS OR BLACKLISTS
- We publish no product rankings, scores or blacklists of any kind.
- NO PAYMENT FROM BRANDS
- We accept no payment from brands for a positive conclusion, for inclusion or for ordering. No affiliate links or commissions.
- NO ENDORSEMENT BY TITLE
- A degree and research experience show training in method; they say nothing about whether any product works or is safe.
“The evidence is limited” is allowed to be the final conclusion.
This isn't evasion. It is the method itself.
This boundary is built into how the services work, not just stated
Before you enter any product details, the L3 personal expert review goes through a manual check: accepted, not suitable, or referred to a professional. Once a referral is needed, that result overrides every later product conclusion and any commercial output; the referral is free and carries no paid link.
The free two-product comparison tool has the same boundary: each product must first be confirmed as a food supplement or a medicine. If either one is a medicine or can't be confirmed, the whole comparison stops: no result, and no paid offer is shown.
The categories order decisions; they don't assert that a product is “effective” or “ineffective”, and they don't replace a judgment on drug interactions or medical risk.